REVIEWS / DESKTOPS / INTEL

Editors' ChoiceIntel Next Unit of Computing Review

05 Jan, 2013, 11:42 am IST | by Jamshed Avari , Anand Tuliani | Desktops

Desktops

The NUC is barely 4 inches square

The NUC is barely 4 inches square
There aren't very many ports on the rear panel.
The insides are tightly packed with little room for expansion
You'll need an mSATA SSD and a mini-PCIe Wi-Fi adapter
Diagram showing the NUC's motherboard layout.

PRICE IN INDIA

20,000

TECH2 RATING

8.0

AVERAGE USER RATING

7.0

How we test

CONTACT

Intel

  sasupport@mailbox.intel.com

 +91 80 2854 2105

 www.intel.com

Let’s face it: desktop tower PCs are out of fashion. Laptops are the first choice for most people buying a computer today. There’s no longer any compromise in terms of power or capabilities when choosing to dump the traditional boxy tower PC. For those who want to sit at a desk with a larger screen, all-in-ones are an attractive option. The only real reasons most people go with a tower PC today are the relatively low cost, the choice of more powerful components, the room for expansion and the ability to swap or upgrade parts easily over time. Not everyone needs that kind of flexibility though—how often do we need to add or upgrade anything that can’t be plugged in to a USB port? The increasing integration and miniaturisation of components has meant that you never really need to open up your PC, and therefore, all that room for expansion will, in all likelihood, never be used.

 

With that basic idea in mind, Intel has brought what it calls the Next Unit of Computing (NUC) to the market. The company has imagined what the norm would be if all the traditional reasons for having big, boxy computer cabinets could be done away with. The result fits into a box that’s just four inches square and a couple of inches high. We’ve seen compact PCs before, but never has there been such tight integration of components like this. It’s all possible because of the high performance and low heat output of Intel’s latest hardware.

 The NUC is barely 4 inches square

The NUC is barely 4 inches square

 

 

Features

The NUC is essentially an Ultrabook without the integrated screen and keyboard. Three main chips constitute the device’s guts: a low-voltage Core i3-3217U CPU, the QS77 Express platform controller (essentially the chipset) and a Thunderbolt controller. The motherboard has two slots for laptop-sized SO-DIMM RAM modules and two mini PCIe slots (one half-length) ideally for a Wi-Fi module and SSD. That’s all there is in terms of internal expansion and upgradeability. Three USB 2.0 ports, HDMI and Thunderbolt can be found on the front and back of the box. This might seem limited, but bear in mind that Thunderbolt allows for multiple displays, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 and various other peripherals via accessories. It’s still more than what some ultraportable laptops offer. An SD card reader and USB 3.0 would have been nice, but those will have to wait for future platforms. There is another NUC model available, which swaps the Thunderbolt port for a Gigabit Ethernet port and a second HDMI output. This lowers the cost slightly and could be suitable in some situations, but limits the device’s capabilities to a large extent.

 

The NUC ships as a barebones device, and it’s relatively easy to undo the four screws holding the bottom plate on. Intel provided an mSATA SSD and Wi-Fi controller for us to review our test unit with, and we popped in 4GB of DDR3 RAM of our own. Installing the components was dead simple, but we noticed the NUC running quite hot right from the start.

Diagram showing the NUC's motherboard layout.

Diagram showing the NUC's motherboard layout

 

 

Performance

We ran a few benchmarks and came away with scores of 73.18 seconds in POV-Ray and 1.71 in CineBench, which makes the NUC’s performance comparable to that of an entry-level laptop. Our file compression test (100MB of assorted files in 7-zip using the Ultra preset) took 131 seconds and the MPG to H.264 video encoding test took 94 seconds for a 1-minute clip, which is longer than average for mainstream Ultrabooks. Similarly, the PCMark and 3DMark Vantage scores of 8267 and 9053 (entry) respectively reveal that the NUC is great for everyday computing and enjoying videos, but not for heavy work like gaming or video editing. Sequential read and write speeds for the mSATA SSD were 431.8MB/s and 251MB/s respectively, although your mileage will vary since you’ll have to buy your own SSD.

 

The NUC’s performance easily surpasses that of other compact PCs we’ve tested, including the similarly sized Zotac Zbox nano XS we reviewed last year. That device is based on an AMD E-450 APU with an integrated Radeon HD 6320 GPU and cost Rs 25,400 at the time of review (including a 64GB SSD, USB 3.0, an IR remote and a Wi-Fi adapter).

The insides are tightly packed with little room for expansion

The insides are tightly packed with little room for expansion

 

 

The NUC is a fascinating device and we can easily see it working anywhere a tiny, quiet PC is needed. With Ultrabook-level performance in an Atom-sized box, the NUC would work well hooked up to a TV screen for casual games, Web browsing and home media streaming. It could even suffice as a primary PC for many people both at work and at home. It’s certain to end up as the centre of quite a few DIY projects and will probably also be used extensively in embedded systems such as smart interactive outdoor signage. Of course, the limited storage and graphics horsepower mean that gamers and enthusiasts will still favour ATX towers for the foreseeable future.

 

While tiny, it’s clear that this is not a budget-minded product. Beyond the barebones NUC’s MRP, you’ll have to buy your own RAM, mSATA SSD and Wi-Fi adapter or USB/Thunderbolt Ethernet adapter plus accessories. Given the unit’s price, we can’t really call it an Atom killer. It’s more evenly matched against compact PCs built around AMD’s E-series APUs which offer superior graphics at the cost of raw CPU power.

You'll need an mSATA SSD and a mini-PCIe Wi-Fi adapter

You'll need an mSATA SSD and a mini-PCIe Wi-Fi adapter

 

 

Conclusion and price in India

The NUC with Thunderbolt costs Rs 20,000 and the model with the extra HDMI port and Gigabit Ethernet instead costs Rs 18,000. This is slightly cheaper than Zotac’s recent Intel and AMD-based Zbox models, although those usually include a hard drive or SSD, RAM, Wi-Fi, IR remotes, USB 3.0, eSATA and a card reader.

 

Also, as impressive as the NUC is, we would have preferred a reasonably larger box with space for the type of slim 2.5-inch SSD that’s used in Ultrabooks, and perhaps a few USB 3.0 ports and Ethernet built in. In a perfect world, there’d even be a way to integrate a discrete GPU, such as the modular graphics cards used in laptops today. We hope that Intel isn’t the only one thinking about using low-voltage CPUs in this kind of form factor, and that companies like Zotac will build on the idea.

 

Dimensions: 116 x 112 x 394 mm; Weight: 511 g; Processor: Intel Core i3-3217U; RAM: 2 DDR3 SO-DIMM slots; Expansion slots: 2 PCIe/mSATA; GPU: Intel HD4000; Connectivity: 3x USB 2.0, 1x Thunderbolt


Tags:

Intel NUC , NUC , Intel NUC review , Next Unit of Computing , Intel Next Unit of Computing , mini PC

Would you buy it?




Newegg TV_ Intel Next Unit of Computing (NUC) Overview

23 Jan, 2013, 03:19 am IST

Newegg TV_ Intel Next Unit of Computing ...

Intel NUC unboxing

22 Jan, 2013, 12:30 am IST

Intel NUC unboxing

 


How We Test

The Tech2 Labs receives many products every single week and each of them is tested with the utmost care and highest level of objectivity. There’s a constant effort to reduce and totally eliminate subjectivity. Each product is tested according to set test processes so the same test scenario is used.

Verdict
The ratings awarded to a product are derived from a number of tests and calculations, keeping certain important factors in mind. These factors consist of features, performance, quality and value for money. In case of software and some other categories, build quality might be replaced with ease of use or ease of installation. Products are compared with other products in a similar price range or product category.


Features
The features component of the score is rated based on the kind of features present on a particular product. Features are a big part of what people look for when they’re buying a new product such as a phone or a camera.

Performance
The performance score is derived from the benchmarks and tests run on the product. In case of the subjective scores, an average of the scores given by the group of reviewers is considered.

Build Quality
The build quality of a product is important so that it doesn’t fall apart after some use. The build quality scores from the way the product is designed and the kind of materials used in the product.

Value
Value for money comes from the fact that a cheap product is able to provide most of the performance of a higher priced product. Once again, value for money is judged by comparing pricing and performance of products in a particular price range or category. 

There are many other aspects of the product that are looked at such as the bundled software and accessories. All of these scores are aggregated together to form the final score.

What do the ratings mean?

Ratings are simple - higher the score, the better the product. A brief listing of the features and what they mean are given below.

1 - 3

The product is bad in almost every aspect. We strongly advise against purchasing this product.

4 - 6

An average product that isn't the best you can buy, but isn't the worst either.

7 - 8

Product with this rating is highly recommended because it's priced sensibly, has a good set of features and performs well.

9 - 10

Exceptionally excellent product with features and performance unlike any we've seen in the past. A must-have for everyone!

What is the Average User Rating?

We at Tech2 take product reviewing very seriously and every product is tested with the utmost care and level of objectivity. The end user who buys a particular product and uses it over an extended period of time has his own take on a product and there might be nuances that he or she can shed light on. The Average User Rating is present to help readers get the complete picture of how good or bad a product is. The Average User Rating is calculated by averaging the ratings by the thousands of readers visiting Tech2.com every single day. To record your own rating of a product, simply click on the user rating bar. If you disagree with our ratings or our community's product rating, please don't hesitate from voicing your opinion in the comments section below the review.

Leaked Images, Availability, Pricing,
Specs, Pre-order

Samsung Galaxy S4 Video Review

Samsung Galaxy S4 Video Review

14 May, 2013, 11:30 AM

4.5

HP ElitePad 900 Video Review

HP ElitePad 900 Video Review

14 May, 2013, 11:24 AM

2.5

Samsung Galaxy S4 interface and gestures demo

Samsung Galaxy S4 interface and gestures...

26 Apr, 2013, 02:55 AM

3.1

MORE VIDEOS

Build a powerful desktop PC for less than Rs 27,000

Build a powerful desktop PC for less than Rs 27,000

We kick-start our summer desktop PC-buying guide with building a basic yet

By Roydon Cerejo

Tech2 speaks with Eben Upton, co-founder, Raspberry Pi Foundation

Tech2 speaks with Eben Upton, co-founder, Raspberry Pi Foundation

We spoke with Eben Upton, trustee and co-founder of Raspberry Pi...

By Naina Khedekar

Build your gaming rig for roughly 1.2 lakhs

Build your gaming rig for roughly 1.2 lakhs

We’ve seen two budget rigs already, one for around Rs. 35,000 for the...

By Roydon Cerejo

MORE FEATURES

Acer Iconia W510 Review

Vumsuan Valte

Sun May 19, 23:54:10

MORE DISCUSSIONS