REVIEWS / GRAPHICS CARDS / XFX (RASHI PERIPHERALS PVT LTD)

XFX Radeon HD 6570 - Good Value for Money

11 Jun, 2011, 1:08 pm IST | by Aaron Almeida | Graphics Cards Graphics Cards

Identical in design to the XFX Radeon HD 6670

Identical in design to the XFX Radeon HD 6670
Can fit in a single PCIe slot

PRICE IN INDIA

3,950
View Stores

TECH2 RATING

6.5

AVERAGE USER RATING

How we test

CONTACT

XFX (Rashi Peripherals Pvt Ltd)

 response@rptechindia.com

 91 22 4047 0828

 www.rptechindia.com

The third of the XFX cards in the entry-level graphics card that we’re reviewing is the HD6570. We recently reviewed the HD6670, HD6570 and the passive cooled HD6450. The HD 6670 was the fastest of the three cards and the HD 6450 turned out to be the perfect HTPC graphics solution.

Can fit in a single PCIe slot

Can fit in a single PCIe slot

 


Today, we look at the Radeon HD 6570 (HD-657X-ZAF3), a card that is designed for casual gaming, watching HD movies and can also be configured to be used in an HTPC. It’s positioned right in between the HD6450 and the HD6670.

Design and Features
Like all of the Radeon cards from XFX, the HD6570 too uses a custom cooler design. The graphics card use 1 GB of DDR5 Hynix memory. There are four RAM modules used and the heatsink doesn’t make contact with any of them. The Radeon 6670 GPU is clocked at 650 MHz and the memory operates at 1600 MHz. The fan and the heatsink on the card are fully exposed. This card, like all of the entry-level cards is slim and takes up a single expansion slot. Unlike the HD6450, however, it’s not a low profile card, so you won’t be able to use this card on a really slim cabinet. In terms of design and size, the HD 6570 looks exactly the same as the HD 6670.

Eyefinty support up to four monitors using the HDMI, D-Sub and DVI ports

Eyefinty support up to four monitors using the HDMI, D-Sub and DVI ports

 


There are connectivity options for HDMI, D-Sub, as well as DVI. This HD 6670 supports AMD’s CrossfireX and also Eyefinity, which allows up to four monitors to be connected to a single card.

Test Rig Specifications

  • Processor: Intel Core i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40 GHz
  • Motherboard: GIGABYTE P67A-UD3R
  • Memory: Corsair Dominator GT 6 GB DDR3 (3 x 2 GB)
  • Hard drive: WD Velociraptor  300 GB
  • GPU: XFX HD6570 (HD-657X-ZAF3)
  • PSU: Cooler Master Silent Pro 1000W


Performance
Not only is the XFX HD 6570 identical in terms of design to the HD 6670, but its also identical in terms of specifications. Other than the clock speed of the GPU, the 6570 has the same number of stream processors, memory and speed as well. The GPU is the only component clocked to 650MHz, which is technically, a big drop from the HD6670.

XFX HD 6570 showed consistant performances

XFX HD 6570 showed consistant performances

 


We ran the same set of benchmarks that we did on the HD6670 and the HD6450. The resolution that we used for these benchmarks was 1680x1050, again targeting users with smaller displays. The image quality was also lowered by turning all anti-aliasing, anisotropic filtering and tessellation features for the games.

Scores across all benchmarks were almost identical. To start with 3D Mark Vantage, we got a  d score of 5201 points for the HD6570 and a GPU score of 4129. The faster HD6670 scores an overall score of 5635 points and a GPU score of 4496 in comparison. This might sound like a lot more, but real world game benchmarks are where the difference can be easily made out.

In games based on the Source Engine, such as Left 4 Dead 2, we saw average frame rates of 104.85 fps, which is just 10 fps lower than the HD6670. The same trend could be noticed across all of the other game benchmarks. For example, Just Cause 2, Mafia 2 and even Crysis 2 only saw a drop of rougly 2 fps each. While playing games, you’re bound to decrease the quality settings even more to make some of these games playable, but even then, the difference between the cards isn’t going to increase by a large margin. These small variations in frame rates are hardly noticeable. So it’s clear that the HD6570 is a slower GPU, it doesn’t affect the overall performance of the card by a lot.

Identical in design to the XFX Radeon HD 6670

Identical in design to the XFX Radeon HD 6670

 


Verdict
The XFX HD6570 is consistently slower than the XFX HD6670, but only by the tiniest of differences. We thought the XFX HD6670, although slower than the ASUS HD6670, was good value for money. The HD6570 is even more impressive in that aspect. The MRP stated by XFX is Rs. 7,000 but the card sells for approximately Rs. 3,950 in the market. This makes the HD6570, Rs.400 cheaper than the HD6670. The performance increase you get by buying a HD6670 is proportional to the price. If you’re looking for that tiny boost in performance, go get yourself a 6670, if you’re tight on cash, the HD6570 will do just fine.

Tags: XFX Radeon HD 6570 , XFX , Graphics Cards , XFX (Rashi Peripherals Pvt Ltd) , GPU , Eyefinity , CrossfireX , HDMI , D-Sub , DVI , Radeon HD 6570 , benchmarks , Hynix

Would you buy it?




RELATED STORIES

AMD board partners may be working on custom HD 7970 X2

So you know the drill by now, graphics chipset giants, Nvidia and AMD design a reference card and then board ...

ZOTAC launches AMP! and 4GB Editions of the GTX 680

ZOTAC launches G.ONE signature edition graphics cards

AMD 28nm GPUs rumoured to surface in December

Rumors deny launch of AMD Radeon 7000 GPUs in 2011

Budget graphics card comparison test

ASUS ENGTS450 DirectCU TOP/DI/1GD5 Graphics Card

 

How We Test

The Tech2 Labs receives many products every single week and each of them is tested with the utmost care and highest level of objectivity. There’s a constant effort to reduce and totally eliminate subjectivity. Each product is tested according to set test processes so the same test scenario is used.

Verdict
The ratings awarded to a product are derived from a number of tests and calculations, keeping certain important factors in mind. These factors consist of features, performance, quality and value for money. In case of software and some other categories, build quality might be replaced with ease of use or ease of installation. Products are compared with other products in a similar price range or product category.


Features
The features component of the score is rated based on the kind of features present on a particular product. Features are a big part of what people look for when they’re buying a new product such as a phone or a camera.

Performance
The performance score is derived from the benchmarks and tests run on the product. In case of the subjective scores, an average of the scores given by the group of reviewers is considered.

Build Quality
The build quality of a product is important so that it doesn’t fall apart after some use. The build quality scores from the way the product is designed and the kind of materials used in the product.

Value
Value for money comes from the fact that a cheap product is able to provide most of the performance of a higher priced product. Once again, value for money is judged by comparing pricing and performance of products in a particular price range or category. 

There are many other aspects of the product that are looked at such as the bundled software and accessories. All of these scores are aggregated together to form the final score.

What do the ratings mean?

Ratings are simple - higher the score, the better the product. A brief listing of the features and what they mean are given below.

1 - 3

The product is bad in almost every aspect. We strongly advise against purchasing this product.

4 - 6

An average product that isn't the best you can buy, but isn't the worst either.

7 - 8

Product with this rating is highly recommended because it's priced sensibly, has a good set of features and performs well.

9 - 10

Exceptionally excellent product with features and performance unlike any we've seen in the past. A must-have for everyone!

What is the Average User Rating?

We at Tech2 take product reviewing very seriously and every product is tested with the utmost care and level of objectivity. The end user who buys a particular product and uses it over an extended period of time has his own take on a product and there might be nuances that he or she can shed light on. The Average User Rating is present to help readers get the complete picture of how good or bad a product is. The Average User Rating is calculated by averaging the ratings by the thousands of readers visiting Tech2.com every single day. To record your own rating of a product, simply click on the user rating bar. If you disagree with our ratings or our community's product rating, please don't hesitate from voicing your opinion in the comments section below the review.

Leaked Images, Availability, Pricing,
Specs, Pre-order

ZOTAC GTX 670 Amp Edition Review

ZOTAC GTX 670 Amp Edition Review

22 May, 2012, 12:53 PM IST

 8.0

We’ve seen what Nvidia’s latest graphics muncher is capable of and now it’s time to take a look at some of the ...

MSI R7950 Twin Frozr 3GD5 Review

Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 Review

Asus HD 7870 DirectCU II TOP Review

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 680 Review

Asus HD 7970 (DC2T-3GD5) Review

MORE REVIEWS

features

Top 5 graphics cards under Rs.15,000

Top 5 graphics cards under Rs.15,000

There’s nothing quite like a good ol’ summer vacation, but sadly, all...

By Roydon Cerejo

Budget graphics card comparison test

Budget graphics card comparison test

One thing we’ve all been noticing is that the requirements of games have

By Aaron Almeida , Rossi Fernandes

Immerse Yourself in Culture to be a Better Businessman, Says NVIDIA’s Trivedi

Immerse Yourself in Culture to be a Better Businessman, Says NVIDIA’s Trivedi

This is the fifth interview in an ongoing series on innovative thinkers...

By tech2 News Staff

MORE FEATURES