REVIEWS / SMARTPHONES / NOKIA

Nokia Lumia 800 Review

13 Dec, 2011, 6:30 pm IST | by Shayne Rana | Smartphones

Smartphones

Sleek lines

Sleek lines
Contoured edges with simple elegant styling
A typical WP7 homepage, no rrom for customisation of course
The gaming zone
Ready to handle your gaming needs
Maps to take you places
Sweet music

PRICE IN INDIA

22,990

TECH2 RATING

7.0

AVERAGE USER RATING

7.5

How we test

CONTACT

Nokia

  http://www.nokia.co.in/support/ask-nokia

  +91 (city code) 30303838

 www.nokia.co.in

It’s the end of the year and Nokia has finally announced its “Piece de resistance” handset – the Lumia 800. It’s the first, of course in the series and is based on their MeeGo running N9 device only this one is, of course, running on the latest version of the Windows Phone 7 OS, which is Mango. We’ve already done a detailed preview of the handset where we outlined the kind of features it comes with, but here’s a closer look at the overall functionality.

Form Factor
The Lumia 800 is built out of a single block of Polycarbonate plastic. Don’t let the ‘plastic’ part sway you as the handset is quite durable. It sustained quiet a few hard knocks and drops from about 2 feet without too much of scratching or any issues with functionality. The 3.7-inch, slightly raised gorilla glass display, although quite a fingerprint magnet, survived quite a bit of torture without giving in to scratches. So, in terms of durability and funky design form, the Lumia 800 is definitely high on our ranking. If the slippery shell doesn’t meet your fancy, worry not as Nokia has thrown in a rubberized case that makes it much easier to manage.

 

The gaming zone

Slim and sleek

 


Check out our Hands-On preview for more information on the 800’s design.

Features and Performance
Interface
Powered by a 1.4GHz Scorpion processor and running the Windows Phone Mango (7.5) OS, the Lumia 800 is a seriously speedy handset. When it comes to functionality, as limited as the OS itself may be, the Lumia 800 manages to do everything it’s capable of extremely well. WP7’s stripped down; visually simplistic user interface is what keeps most of their handsets, irrespective of processing power, running quite smoothly. The Tile and Hub set up is really what makes WP7 so attractive. Unfortunately for Nokia though, this fantastic piece of hardware can’t live up to its true potential that’s curtailed by the OS. The Linpak Benchmark test we subjected it to gave us a score of 49.3 Mflops, which is impressive as far as mobile handsets go. Multi-tasking was, of course, a non-issue.

A typical WP7 homepage, no rrom for customisation of course

Simple and easy to mange UI

 


Although WP7 is a user-friendly system, like we’ve said many times before, it’s still in its nascent stage and will require a considerable amount of tweaking before it can really give Android or iOS a run for their money. The few things about the Lumia 800 we took issue with, included the fact that Nokia has decided to go Micro SIM on us and also leave out the external memory support. Like the N8, the uni-body design translates to; should your phone hang, restarting it will not be as easy as it used to be. Thankfully, the Lumia 800 functioned without any “hang-ups”. But it seems like a - if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em - type of sentiment is at play here.

What we also noticed with the otherwise crystal clear display was that whites usually took on a slightly yellowish tone. This was especially noticeable on websites with white backgrounds. Other than that, visibility in broad daylight from any angle was top-notch. 

Media
It was quite surprising to see that Nokia missed on including any audio enhancements for the 800 and that is a major downer. Audio quality was consistent with any other high-end smartphone, but it could have surely been better with a few options to personalize the output. We did find the decibel level a tad low, especially in crowded areas. The speaker phone was also a little too low for our comfort level. The built-in FM radio was just fine and even managed to pick up signals quite well on a daily commute through the city. Nokia has pre-installed TuneIn for Internet radio options as well.

Ready to handle your gaming needs

The audio quality would have been so much better with some enhancement options

 


Once again, we were plagued with the Zune menace, meaning we had to make sure that our videos were first compatible with the software, before it could take its own sweet time transferring to the handset. Once on the handset, the picture quality, Nokia’s Clear Black Display enriched the colors. 16Gigs of internal storage space is also quite a bit to keep media lovers fairly satisfied, even if they can’t extend it any further.

Page 1:

Design - UI - Media


Tags:

Nokia Lumia 800 Review , Nokia Lumia , Lumia Series , Microsoft Windows Phone 7 , Windows Phone 7 Mango , Nokia-Microsoft , Lumia 800 , Touchscreen , 8 Megapixel , Micro SIM.Nokia Drive , Nokia Maps , Nokia Lumia 800 Release Date , Nokia Lumia 800 Price , Nokia Lumia 800 Indian Release Date , Nokia Lumia 800 Price in India , Nokia Lumia 800 Indian Price , Nokia Lumia 800 Indian Launch ,

Would you buy it?




 


How We Test

The Tech2 Labs receives many products every single week and each of them is tested with the utmost care and highest level of objectivity. There’s a constant effort to reduce and totally eliminate subjectivity. Each product is tested according to set test processes so the same test scenario is used.

Verdict
The ratings awarded to a product are derived from a number of tests and calculations, keeping certain important factors in mind. These factors consist of features, performance, quality and value for money. In case of software and some other categories, build quality might be replaced with ease of use or ease of installation. Products are compared with other products in a similar price range or product category.


Features
The features component of the score is rated based on the kind of features present on a particular product. Features are a big part of what people look for when they’re buying a new product such as a phone or a camera.

Performance
The performance score is derived from the benchmarks and tests run on the product. In case of the subjective scores, an average of the scores given by the group of reviewers is considered.

Build Quality
The build quality of a product is important so that it doesn’t fall apart after some use. The build quality scores from the way the product is designed and the kind of materials used in the product.

Value
Value for money comes from the fact that a cheap product is able to provide most of the performance of a higher priced product. Once again, value for money is judged by comparing pricing and performance of products in a particular price range or category. 

There are many other aspects of the product that are looked at such as the bundled software and accessories. All of these scores are aggregated together to form the final score.

What do the ratings mean?

Ratings are simple - higher the score, the better the product. A brief listing of the features and what they mean are given below.

1 - 3

The product is bad in almost every aspect. We strongly advise against purchasing this product.

4 - 6

An average product that isn't the best you can buy, but isn't the worst either.

7 - 8

Product with this rating is highly recommended because it's priced sensibly, has a good set of features and performs well.

9 - 10

Exceptionally excellent product with features and performance unlike any we've seen in the past. A must-have for everyone!

What is the Average User Rating?

We at Tech2 take product reviewing very seriously and every product is tested with the utmost care and level of objectivity. The end user who buys a particular product and uses it over an extended period of time has his own take on a product and there might be nuances that he or she can shed light on. The Average User Rating is present to help readers get the complete picture of how good or bad a product is. The Average User Rating is calculated by averaging the ratings by the thousands of readers visiting Tech2.com every single day. To record your own rating of a product, simply click on the user rating bar. If you disagree with our ratings or our community's product rating, please don't hesitate from voicing your opinion in the comments section below the review.

SPOTLIGHT

Huawei Ascend Mate: A specifications review

Huawei Ascend Mate: A specifications review

Priced at Rs 24,900, the 6.1-inch Ascend Mate may face stiff competition...

By Anujeet Majumdar

Lenovo K900: A specifications review

Lenovo K900: A specifications review

Lenovo's new flagship, the K900, has a very attractive stainless...

By Nikhil Subramaniam

First impressions: Lenovo K900

First impressions: Lenovo K900

We got to spend some time with the new Lenovo flagship K900 and...

By Nikhil Subramaniam

MORE FEATURES

Lava Iris 504Q Review

Lava Iris 504Q Review

17 Jun, 2013, 09:42 AM IST

 7.0

Lava has just launched its newest smartphone in its ever-expanding Iris line-up—the Iris 504Q. Lava is targeting the mid-end segment with its price tag of Rs 13,499, and is looking to compete directly with the likes of Micromax’s Canvas line-up. Let’s see if it can compete, shall we?

Panasonic P51 Review

Micromax A88 Canvas Music Review

Gionee Elife E3 Review

WickedLeak Wammy Passion Z Review

Alcatel One Touch Idol Ultra Review

MORE REVIEWS

Panasonic P51 Review

Annu Tiwari

Wed Jun 19, 21:57:42

Panasonic P51 Review

Rohini Dhaiya

Wed Jun 19, 21:47:18

MORE DISCUSSIONS