REVIEWS / TABLETS / MERCURY (KOBIAN PTE LTD)

Mercury mTab NEO 2 Review

29 Jun, 2012, 5:33 pm IST | by Roydon Cerejo | Tablets

Tablets

Not a bad looker

Not a bad looker
Plenty of connectivity
Glossy finish is never a good idea
Audio quality is strictly average
Stock Honeycomb interface
Web browsing is a pretty poor experience
The camera is just for show

PRICE IN INDIA

15,000

TECH2 RATING

3.0

AVERAGE USER RATING

6.5

How we test

CONTACT

Mercury (Kobian Pte Ltd)

 sales_india@kobian.com

 +91 11 4052 9574

 http://www.kobian.com/

Mercury hasn’t really hit their stride in the tablet arena and their previous two offerings – the mTab and mTab NEO really failed badly where it mattered most and that’s the display quality. Fitting a bad display in a tablet is like ruining the steering of a car, it’s never going to feel good no matter how many features it may have. Hopefully they have learned their lesson with the mTab NEO 2. Let’s see if it’s any better.

Design and Build
The design and build of the tablet hasn’t changed much except that now it sports a full black colour scheme from back to front. The glossy finish leads to terrible finger prints all over the tablet which is a nightmare to get rid of. The build quality is not too bad and there aren’t many creaking parts. The plastics used also seem to be quite decent with very little flex when pressed. It’s still a chunky tablet but thankfully is lighter than the previous offerings. There’s a physical button in the front like the iPad which takes you a step back instead of taking you to the home screen directly. We also have a front facing VGA camera.

Not a bad looker

Not a bad looker

 


For connectivity we have a charging port, miniUSB port for data and another one for OTG support. There’s microHDMI, 3.5mm headphone jack, microSD card slot and a SIM card slot. Round the back we also have a primary camera for shooting stills and video. We also have a small group of physical buttons on the right for power, back and home. There isn’t any volume toggle button, which will be missed. Overall, the mTab NEO 2 gets off to a good start by offering a decent design, good set of connectivity options and above average build quality.

Features
Interface
For some reason, Mercury has decided to bundle the NEO 2 with Honeycomb instead of ICS. While it’s functionally better than Gingerbread on a tablet, it’s nowhere as quick and smooth as ICS. Mercury has made some changes to the interface like the lockscreen and a few of the icons and the theme but for the most part, it’s stock ICS. Unfortunately, Mercury has fallen into the same trap they did with the previous two tablets by adding a very poor quality display. The 7-inch screen, even at the maximum brightness levels, is not very bright and the responsiveness is not great either. You can forget about using the tablet while charging as the screen goes haywire.

Plenty of connectivity

Plenty of connectivity

 


The one thing that we hate is the fact that Mercury is terribly misleading the consumer by calling the NEO 2 a dual-core tablet, when it actually has a single-core ARMv7 based CPU. The Linpack scores clearly point to a single-core 1GHz CPU and a very slow one at that. We got a single threaded score of just 12MFLOPS and a multi-thread score of 11MFLOPS. The tablet does however have the ARM NEON video decoder onboard so despite it being a single-core, 1080p video does play.

Media
Mercury has used a custom-skinned stock music player so you get the standard set of options for sorting your music. You also get the option to download lyrics of the song. The weird thing about this player is that it also picks up audio from apps for some reason so in your library, you’ll have Metallica along sound effects from Angry Birds! The audio quality itself is pretty average even with a decent pair of headphones. You get 8GB of internal storage which you can expand via microSD card.

Audio quality is strictly average

Audio quality is strictly average

 


The NEO 2 comes with the stock video player which is useless as it only plays MP4 but the other one called UTPlayer will play all possible formats you can throw at it and it does it well. We did have trouble playing back 1080p video files as there was noticeable stutter in the frame rate and some of the files refused to play properly.

Page 1:

Page1

Page 2:

Page2


Tags:

Mercury mTab NEO 2 , Mercury mTab NEO 2 review , Mercury mTab NEO 2 price , Mercury mTab NEO 2 price in india , Mercury mTab NEO 2 price in mumbai , Mercury mTab NEO 2 price in delhi , Mercury mTab NEO 2 specs , Mercury mTab NEO 2 specifications , Mercury mTab NEO 2 features , Mercury mTab NEO 2 android tablet , worst android tablet , mercury mtab , mercury mtab neo , mercury mtab neo vs mtab neo 2 , honeycomb tablet , android tablet , tablet

Would you buy it?




 


How We Test

The Tech2 Labs receives many products every single week and each of them is tested with the utmost care and highest level of objectivity. There’s a constant effort to reduce and totally eliminate subjectivity. Each product is tested according to set test processes so the same test scenario is used.

Verdict
The ratings awarded to a product are derived from a number of tests and calculations, keeping certain important factors in mind. These factors consist of features, performance, quality and value for money. In case of software and some other categories, build quality might be replaced with ease of use or ease of installation. Products are compared with other products in a similar price range or product category.


Features
The features component of the score is rated based on the kind of features present on a particular product. Features are a big part of what people look for when they’re buying a new product such as a phone or a camera.

Performance
The performance score is derived from the benchmarks and tests run on the product. In case of the subjective scores, an average of the scores given by the group of reviewers is considered.

Build Quality
The build quality of a product is important so that it doesn’t fall apart after some use. The build quality scores from the way the product is designed and the kind of materials used in the product.

Value
Value for money comes from the fact that a cheap product is able to provide most of the performance of a higher priced product. Once again, value for money is judged by comparing pricing and performance of products in a particular price range or category. 

There are many other aspects of the product that are looked at such as the bundled software and accessories. All of these scores are aggregated together to form the final score.

What do the ratings mean?

Ratings are simple - higher the score, the better the product. A brief listing of the features and what they mean are given below.

1 - 3

The product is bad in almost every aspect. We strongly advise against purchasing this product.

4 - 6

An average product that isn't the best you can buy, but isn't the worst either.

7 - 8

Product with this rating is highly recommended because it's priced sensibly, has a good set of features and performs well.

9 - 10

Exceptionally excellent product with features and performance unlike any we've seen in the past. A must-have for everyone!

What is the Average User Rating?

We at Tech2 take product reviewing very seriously and every product is tested with the utmost care and level of objectivity. The end user who buys a particular product and uses it over an extended period of time has his own take on a product and there might be nuances that he or she can shed light on. The Average User Rating is present to help readers get the complete picture of how good or bad a product is. The Average User Rating is calculated by averaging the ratings by the thousands of readers visiting Tech2.com every single day. To record your own rating of a product, simply click on the user rating bar. If you disagree with our ratings or our community's product rating, please don't hesitate from voicing your opinion in the comments section below the review.

SPOTLIGHT

Asus FonePad Review

Asus FonePad Review

08 May, 2013, 09:41 AM IST

 7.5

The FonePad goes head-on against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2. Can it prove to be a better offering?

HP ElitePad 900 Review

Acer Iconia Tab B1 Review

Asus Transformer Pad TF300TG Review

Asus Nexus 7 3G Review

Zync Quad 9.7 Review

MORE REVIEWS

Hot launches: Tablets of April 2013

Hot launches: Tablets of April 2013

Some of the more notable tablet launches in the month of April are what...

By Shayne Rana

Asus Fonepad – A Specifications Review

Asus Fonepad – A Specifications Review

After having launched the Google Nexus 7 tablet in India, Asus has now...

By Shayne Rana

Top 5 large screen tablets under Rs 20,000

Top 5 large screen tablets under Rs 20,000

Today you will find several large screen tablets – ranging from 8 to 10...

By Priyanka Tilve

MORE FEATURES