REVIEWS / TABLETS / MERCURY (KOBIAN PTE LTD)

Mercury mTab Neo Review

08 Feb, 2012, 9:19 am IST | by Roydon Cerejo | Tablets

Tablets

Exposed 3G SIM bay

Exposed 3G SIM bay
Gloss is everywhere
Screen still suffers from poor viewing angles
Nothing new in terms of media
Cpacitive screen is not too bad when browsing
Extremely barren
HDMI-out is a nice addition
Froyo just doesn't cut it anymore
Mercury mTab

on-video-mercury-mtab-neo

PRICE IN INDIA

16,000

TECH2 RATING

5.0

AVERAGE USER RATING

6.5

How we test

CONTACT

Mercury (Kobian Pte Ltd)

 sales_india@kobian.com

 +91 11 4052 9574

 http://www.kobian.com/


Connectivity
The mTab Neo supports GSM and 3G radios and for those who care, you can do voice calls as well. You’ll need the bundled headset or a Bluetooth one, since there’s no earpiece. Other options include, Wi-Fi ‘n’ connectivity and Bluetooth. DLNA support isn’t available right away, though.

Cpacitive screen is not too bad when browsing

Capacitive screen is not too bad when browsing

 


Browsing the Internet is not too bad with the stock browser and the capacitive screen lets you easily zoom in and out of web pages. The dual-core CPU and 512MB RAM ensure pages load quickly and scrolling through them is quick and painless.

Misc. Apps
In terms of extra apps, we have Advanced Task Manager and Skype. There’s also ES File Explorer and a slightly tweaked video player.

Camera
The camera sensor is just a 2MP, but the quality is really bad. The lack of auto-focus makes it even worse. The interface is possibly the worst that we’ve come across in any Android device. You barely get any options for tinkering around with. Only things you can change are the megapixel count, the video quality and the picture quality.

Extremely barren

Extremely barren with no options to tweak the picture

 

 

The is the best we could get

The is the best we could get

 


Video recording is present, but it’s only upto VGA and the frame rate is very choppy as well. The quality of the video is very grainy with plenty of noise creeping in. Suffice to say, this is not one of its strong suits.

Battery Life
The same 4000mAh battery is fitted in the Tab Neo as well, but this time we managed to get slightly more mileage in our video drain tests. We managed to get a good 5hrs and 30min and our loop tests revealed a battery life of 5hrs and 10min. This is not too shabby, considering the tablet is sporting a dual-core CPU this time.

Verdict
At Rs.16,000, we can’t help, but feel it’s quite an expensive proposition for a 7-inch tablet. The Tab Neo does improve a bit from the older version by adding a dual-core CPU and 3G SIM card support, but the jump in price isn’t justified. They’ve also gone one step back by adding Froyo, instead of Gingerbread, which really puzzles us. In the end, the Mercury Tab Neo brings back most of the issues we faced with the first one and leaves us disappointed.

Page 2:

Connectivity - Battery Life and Verdict


Tags:

Mercury Mtab Neo , Mercury Mtab Neo Price , Mercury Mtab Neo Price In India , Mercury Mtab Neo Review , Mercury Mtab , Mercury Mtab Review , Mercury Mtab Price In India , Mercury Mtab Specifications , Mercury Mtab2 , Mercury Mtab Vs Beetel Magiq , Mercury Mtab 7 , tablet , mercury , mtab , mTab Neo

Would you buy it?




 


How We Test

The Tech2 Labs receives many products every single week and each of them is tested with the utmost care and highest level of objectivity. There’s a constant effort to reduce and totally eliminate subjectivity. Each product is tested according to set test processes so the same test scenario is used.

Verdict
The ratings awarded to a product are derived from a number of tests and calculations, keeping certain important factors in mind. These factors consist of features, performance, quality and value for money. In case of software and some other categories, build quality might be replaced with ease of use or ease of installation. Products are compared with other products in a similar price range or product category.


Features
The features component of the score is rated based on the kind of features present on a particular product. Features are a big part of what people look for when they’re buying a new product such as a phone or a camera.

Performance
The performance score is derived from the benchmarks and tests run on the product. In case of the subjective scores, an average of the scores given by the group of reviewers is considered.

Build Quality
The build quality of a product is important so that it doesn’t fall apart after some use. The build quality scores from the way the product is designed and the kind of materials used in the product.

Value
Value for money comes from the fact that a cheap product is able to provide most of the performance of a higher priced product. Once again, value for money is judged by comparing pricing and performance of products in a particular price range or category. 

There are many other aspects of the product that are looked at such as the bundled software and accessories. All of these scores are aggregated together to form the final score.

What do the ratings mean?

Ratings are simple - higher the score, the better the product. A brief listing of the features and what they mean are given below.

1 - 3

The product is bad in almost every aspect. We strongly advise against purchasing this product.

4 - 6

An average product that isn't the best you can buy, but isn't the worst either.

7 - 8

Product with this rating is highly recommended because it's priced sensibly, has a good set of features and performs well.

9 - 10

Exceptionally excellent product with features and performance unlike any we've seen in the past. A must-have for everyone!

What is the Average User Rating?

We at Tech2 take product reviewing very seriously and every product is tested with the utmost care and level of objectivity. The end user who buys a particular product and uses it over an extended period of time has his own take on a product and there might be nuances that he or she can shed light on. The Average User Rating is present to help readers get the complete picture of how good or bad a product is. The Average User Rating is calculated by averaging the ratings by the thousands of readers visiting Tech2.com every single day. To record your own rating of a product, simply click on the user rating bar. If you disagree with our ratings or our community's product rating, please don't hesitate from voicing your opinion in the comments section below the review.

SPOTLIGHT

Asus FonePad Review

Asus FonePad Review

08 May, 2013, 09:41 AM IST

 7.5

The FonePad goes head-on against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2. Can it prove to be a better offering?

HP ElitePad 900 Review

Acer Iconia Tab B1 Review

Asus Transformer Pad TF300TG Review

Asus Nexus 7 3G Review

Zync Quad 9.7 Review

MORE REVIEWS

Hot launches: Tablets of April 2013

Hot launches: Tablets of April 2013

Some of the more notable tablet launches in the month of April are what...

By Shayne Rana

Asus Fonepad – A Specifications Review

Asus Fonepad – A Specifications Review

After having launched the Google Nexus 7 tablet in India, Asus has now...

By Shayne Rana

Top 5 large screen tablets under Rs 20,000

Top 5 large screen tablets under Rs 20,000

Today you will find several large screen tablets – ranging from 8 to 10...

By Priyanka Tilve

MORE FEATURES