Philips SHN5500 vs JBL Reference 510

04 Sep, 2008, 4:13 pm IST | by Siddharth Bhatia

Let's compare... two popular, similar-looking noise cancellation headphones!

Philips SHN5500 vs JBL Reference 510

Performance
Philips SHN5500

The headphones are of 45 ohms, with a sensitivity of 102dB and a good 500 mW of power. The ‘anti-noise’ generated by the headphones is pretty peaceful, meaning it doesn't pierce the eardrums or create too much of that sucked-out, pressured feeling that's notorious in these products. However, it doesn't completely cut down the ambient noise level. The noise cancellation is 10 dB at 300Hz.


Sound reproduction is pretty good, with good wholesome low response, and non-distorting highs. This is good, considering the over-amplification normally creates untrue and inaccurate sound while the noise cancellation is on.

JBL Reference 510
In the case of JBL, when noise canceling circuit is used solely (that is, without music), the noise definitely reduces, but not to the maximum level. It's good for continuous sounds with more lows, like a plane, as the circuit does negate those waves. After all, theoretically it is simpler if the waveform is continuous.

Speech and other material with transients cannot get eliminated, though they do get filtered. Another irritation is that the circuit is a bit noisy, so if you have discerning ears, it could be an issue.

When the music is on, however, it’s better. The spectrum is nice and present, with high clarity levels in the vocals and mid-intensive instruments. Bass and related thump is there in plenty. When the circuit is switched on, the sound remains pretty much the same, which is another plus point, but still I’m not too big a fan of the NC in these Reference 510s.

So in performance the Philips actually wins over the JBL Reference, because mainly the NC is slightly better and there isn't too much noise in the circuit of the Philips.

Conclusion
The Philips SHN5500 costs Rs 2495 while the JBL reference 510 is yours for Rs 7950. This is where I must stress a point: a lower price doesn't automatically translate to a better buy. In this case, the noise cancellation of the Philips is a bit better and the sound also is decent, so it doesn’t make sense to pay so much more for the JBL.

Agreed that there are even more expensive brands in this category, but the Philips wins because it offers better value for money and decent performance. The only downside is perhaps the looks, but then I guess you can’t have everything!

Tags: Philips , JBL , Noise cancellation

RELATED STORIES

Accessorising your smartphone

Accessorising your smartphone

The year 2011 has seen a wide variety of smartphones enter the Indian market.

Jabra launches the Freeway in-car Bluetooth speakerphone

Asus launches ROG Vulcan ANC headset, aimed at pro-gamers

Lenovo IdeaCentre B500 All-in-One PC

Philips 221P3LPYE 22-Inch Monitor

Philips Launches a New Range of LED Backlit and LCD Monitors

Slim 8X External DVD writer, by Lite-on

Philips Carousel Commercial - Adam Berg Commercial of the Year Stink Digital

16 Apr, 2009, 04:52 pm IST

Philips Carousel Commercial - Adam Berg ...

Philips Fidelio

25 May, 2012, 09:43 pm IST

Philips Fidelio

Philips Automotive, the ultimate choice for the road ahead

15 May, 2012, 12:54 pm IST

Philips Automotive, the ultimate choice ...

 

features

5 must buy gaming headsets

5 must buy gaming headsets

Serious gamers rely on their hardware to be at the top of their game.

By Rossi Fernandes

The Importance of Good Ear Care

The Importance of Good Ear Care

Learn to take care of your ears; you need them.

By Siddharth Basrur

GOTY 2010 - Headphones and Earphones

GOTY 2010 - Headphones and Earphones

The best that 2010 has to offer are big names with good quality sound. The

By Ashish Koshy

MORE FEATURES